ddPCR detecteert KRAS-ctDNA vaker dan NGS bij pancreaskanker, wat prognose scherper onderscheidt

PURPOSE: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) carries high mortality despite multimodal therapy, and improved biomarkers are needed to guide perioperative care. This study evaluated the prognostic significance of KRAS-mutant circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) in localized PDAC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In this prospective cohort study (2020-2024), patients with localized PDAC undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) were enrolled across multiple sites within Northwestern Medicine. Blood samples for ctDNA were assessed at diagnosis, post-NAC, and post-resection using tumor-agnostic NGS and ddPCR targeting KRAS G12D/V/R mutations. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The cohort included 106 patients. At diagnosis, KRAS ctDNA was detected in 17.2% (17/99) by NGS and 64.9% (63/97) by ddPCR. Detection by both platforms was associated with shorter OS, with the higher-sensitivity ddPCR assay providing greater prognostic discrimination by identifying additional patients with poor outcomes not captured by NGS (NGS median OS 11.2 vs 30.5 months, p<0.001; ddPCR median OS 24.7 vs 70.9 months, p=0.004). Stratified by detection method, median OS was shortest in patients with ctDNA detected by both NGS and ddPCR (10.9 months), longest in those not detected by either platform (40.7 months), and intermediate in patients detected only by ddPCR (26.9 months; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In localized PDAC, KRAS-mutant ctDNA detected by NGS or ddPCR was associated with worse survival. ddPCR identified additional patients missed by NGS. Integrating ddPCR with NGS ctDNA measures may improve perioperative risk stratification, though validation is needed before clinical implementation.