Screeningdeelneming bij borst-, baarmoederhals- en darmkanker daalt bij ernstige lichamelijke beperkingen
Een analyse van de Amerikaanse National Health Interview Survey (2021-2023) toont aan dat de screeningdeelneming voor borst-, baarmoederhals- en darmkanker aanzienlijk lager is bij volwassenen met een beperking.
Bij ernstige zelfzorgbeperkingen daalde de screeningdeelneming voor borstkanker naar 52% versus 79% en voor baarmoederhalskanker naar 37% versus 78% ten opzichte van mensen zonder beperkingen. Opvallend was juist een hoger gebruik van ontlastingstests bij darmkankerscreening bij personen met ernstige mobiliteitsproblemen (22% versus 16%).
Deze bevindingen benadrukken de noodzaak van aangepaste screeningstrajecten en ondersteunen het gebruik van zelfbemonsteringsmoditeiten om toegankelijkheidsbarrières voor kwetsbare groepen te verkleinen.
Abstract (original)
BACKGROUND: Adults with disabilities face multiple barriers to cancer screening services. Few studies have examined screening receipt across multiple disability domains via standardized measures in contemporary nationally representative samples. METHODS: Data were pooled from the 2021 and 2023 National Health Interview Survey. Prevalence of United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendation concordant breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening was estimated according to disability domain (vision, hearing, mobility, cognition, communication, and self-care) and difficulty level ("substantial," "some," and "none"), which were defined according to the Washington Group Composite Disability Indicator. RESULTS: A total of 1712, 1147, and 3106 sample respondents eligible for breast, cervical, and colorectal screening had disabilities, respectively, which translates to 6.02 million, 5.10 million, and 11.17 million when population weighted. Breast and cervical screening prevalence decreased with increasing difficulty level for self-care, vision, mobility, and cognition domains, with the lowest receipt among those reporting substantial versus no self-care difficulties (breast: 52% vs. 79%; adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58-0.82; cervical: 37% vs. 78%; aPR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51-0.78). Communication disability was associated with lower cervical screening (35% substantial vs. 78% none; aPR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52-0.82) but not for other screenings. Conversely, stool testing for colorectal screening was higher among adults with substantial mobility difficulties (22% vs. 16% none; aPR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.12-1.38) and some self-care, mobility, and vision difficulties, compared to those with none. CONCLUSIONS: Addressing barriers for individuals with self-care limitations could improve suboptimal screening levels across multiple cancer screenings. Self-sampling modalities, including stool testing, may mitigate accessibility issues, and warrant further evaluation.
Dit artikel is een samenvatting van een publicatie in Cancer. Voor het volledige artikel, alle details en referenties verwijzen wij u naar de oorspronkelijke bron.
Lees het volledige artikelDOI: 10.1002/cncr.70557




