Neurocognitieve of neuropsychiatrische presentatie duidt op agressiever IDH-wildtype glioblastoom
In een retrospectieve cohortstudie van 165 patiënten met IDH-wildtype glioblastoom onderzochten onderzoekers of een neurocognitieve of neuropsychiatrische presentatie samenhangt met een slechtere prognose.
Na correctie voor MGMT-methylatie, mate van resectie, KPS, leeftijd en subventriculaire zone-contact bleek deze presentatievorm geassocieerd met een kortere progressievrije overleving (HR 1,77; p=0,012) en een kortere totale overleving (HR 1,71; p=0,041).
Deze bevindingen suggereren dat de klinische presentatie aanvullende prognostische informatie kan bieden naast gangbare moleculaire en radiologische factoren. De resultaten zijn hypothese-genererend en vereisen prospectieve multicentervalidatie voordat ze routinematig in de risicoprofilering kunnen worden opgenomen.
Abstract (original)
OBJECTIVE: In IDH-wildtype glioblastoma, prognosis is conventionally interpreted through established molecular, clinical, surgical and anatomical factors, whereas the prognostic meaning of the mode of onset is less defined. We hypothesized that neurocognitive/neuropsychiatric presentation identifies an adverse clinical phenotype, potentially reflecting diagnostic delay and/or early disruption of distributed cerebral networks. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 165 patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma treated with standard chemoradiation at a single institution. The main presenting symptom was reviewed from clinical documentation and dichotomized as neurocognitive/neuropsychiatric versus all other presentations. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was the secondary endpoint. Multivariable Cox models were adjusted for prespecified covariates: MGMT promoter methylation, extent of resection, baseline Karnofsky Performance Status, age, and subventricular zone contact. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (18.8%) had a neurocognitive/neuropsychiatric onset. In unadjusted analysis, PFS showed a non-significant separation (log-rank p = 0.175), and OS curves did not differ (log-rank p = 0.896). After adjustment, neurocognitive/neuropsychiatric onset was associated with shorter PFS (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.13-2.77; p = 0.012). The OS estimate was concordant and reached statistical significance in the secondary multivariable model (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.02-2.87; p = 0.041). The PFS association was consistent across sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Neurocognitive/neuropsychiatric onset identified a higher-risk presentation phenotype associated with shorter PFS and, in secondary analyses, shorter OS after adjustment for established prognostic factors. These hypothesis-generating findings suggest that clinical mode of onset may capture prognostic information not fully reflected by conventional variables and warrant prospective multicenter validation.
Dit artikel is een samenvatting van een publicatie in Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. Voor het volledige artikel, alle details en referenties verwijzen wij u naar de oorspronkelijke bron.
Lees het volledige artikelDOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2026.109602

